|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|2650368||1139375||2016||6 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود کنید|
ObjectiveTo compare the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for detecting post-cardiac surgery delirium.BackgroundThese tools have not been tested in a specialized cardio-surgical ICU.MethodsSensitivities and specificities of each tool were assessed in a cardio-surgical ICU in Japan by two trained nurses independently. Results were compared with delirium diagnosed by psychiatrists using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision.ResultsThere were 110 daily, paired assessments in 31 patients. The CAM-ICU showed 38% sensitivity and 100% specificity for both nurses. All 20 false-negative cases resulted from high scores in the auditory attention screening in CAM-ICU. The ICDSC showed 97% and 94% sensitivity, and 97% and 91% specificity for the two nurses (cutoff ≥4).ConclusionIn a Japanese cardio-surgical ICU, the ICDSC had a higher sensitivity than the CAM-ICU.
Journal: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care - Volume 45, Issue 1, January–February 2016, Pages 15–20