|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|2655688||1563967||2015||5 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود رایگان|
این مقاله ISI می تواند منبع ارزشمندی برای تولید محتوا باشد.
- تولید محتوا برای سایت و وبلاگ
- تولید محتوا برای کتاب
- تولید محتوا برای نشریات و روزنامه ها
پایگاه «دانشیاری» آمادگی دارد با همکاری مجموعه «شهر محتوا» با استفاده از این مقاله علمی، برای شما به زبان فارسی، تولید محتوا نماید.
PurposeTo assess the effectiveness of automated external defibrillator (AED) and manual external defibrillator (MED) training for third-year nurse students.MethodsWe conducted post-demonstration and post-practice evaluation for MED defibrillation, and pre-training, post-demonstration, and post-practice evaluation for AED defibrillation.ResultsFollowing MED training, time and confidence to defibrillate were improved significantly post-practice (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). In post-demonstration and post-practice evaluation, most students placed electrodes correctly (84.21% vs. 80.70%), cleared before defibrillation (75.44% vs. 89.47%), and performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation immediately after defibrillation (81.81% vs. 94.44%); the evaluations were not statistically different (p = 0.806, p = 0.094, p = 0.198, respectively). For AED training, time and confidence to defibrillate post-demonstration and post-practice were significantly improved (p < 0.001 vs. p < 0.001; p < 0.001 vs. p < 0.001, respectively) compared to that of pre-training; there was no obvious difference between the post-demonstration and post-practice evaluation (p = 0.235, p = 0.346, respectively). Post-AED demonstration, most students could place electrodes correctly (85.96%), clear (91.23%), and perform CPR immediately after defibrillation (85.96%), which remained at a high level post-practice (94.74%, 85.96%, 82.46%, respectively); there was no significant difference between the two evaluations (p = 0.203, p = 0.557, p = 0.776, respectively).ConclusionCombining MED and AED defibrillation training is effective and feasible for third-year nurse students. Minimal training is effective for AED, while MED requires additional practice.
Journal: International Journal of Nursing Sciences - Volume 2, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages 105–109