Effectiveness of cast immobilization in comparison to the gold-standard self-removal orthotic intervention for closed mallet fingers: A randomized clinical trial

Study designRandomized clinical trial.IntroductionAlthough orthotic immobilization has become the preferable treatment choice for closed mallet injuries, it is unclear whether orthosis self-removal has an impact on the final outcome.PurposeTo evaluate the treatment efficacy of cast immobilization of closed mallet fingers using Quickcast® (QC) compared to a removable, lever-type thermoplastic orthosis (LTTP).Methods57 subjects were randomized in 2 groups. DIPj extensor lag and the Gaberman success scale were used as primary outcomes.ResultsLTTP subjects resulted in greater extensor lag than QC subjects (x = 5°; p = 0.05) at 12 weeks from baseline, and high edema and older age negatively affected DIPj extensor lag. No other differences were found between groups.ConclusionCast immobilization seems to be slightly more effective than the traditional approach probably for its greater capacity to reduce edema.Level of evidence1B.