کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2699131 | 1144140 | 2014 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• This review examines commonly used strategies to report Pentacam pachymetry data.
• Some data extraction and reporting strategies can obscure regional corneal thickness asymmetries.
• The chosen approach may influence the interpretation of pachymetry measurements and therefore clinical decision making.
PurposeTo review data extraction strategies for the reporting of non-central corneal thickness with the Pentacam system.MethodsUsing predefined search terms, the electronic National Institutes of Health database (PubMed) was searched for studies assessing non-central corneal thickness using the Pentacam instrument. The article titles of the search results were screened for relevance. The abstracts of papers with appropriate titles were retrieved and read. Articles with relevant abstracts were obtained and read in full. The reference list of each article was hand searched to identify further studies. Articles reporting central corneal thickness only were excluded.ResultsSeventeen peer-reviewed studies were identified. Considerable differences in data extraction and reporting of non-central corneal thickness were noted, with non-central pachymetry being assessed at locations between 1.5 and 5.0 mm away from the centre. The terminology used to describe non-central pachymetry was inconsistent. Ring-averaged and single point pachymetry data have been reported. Ring-averaged pachymetry may obscure considerable regional variability in corneal thickness.ConclusionsThe use of different data extraction and reporting strategies can obscure regional corneal thickness asymmetries. This may influence the monitoring of corneal crosslinking outcomes, the interpretation of corneal swelling in contact lens studies and the clinical decision-making in preoperative assessments of refractive surgery patients. For the reliable identification of regional corneal thickness variations point-pachymetry data appears to be preferable over ring-averaged pachymetry.
Journal: Contact Lens and Anterior Eye - Volume 37, Issue 5, October 2014, Pages 323–330