کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2706602 | 1144820 | 2010 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between driving versus not driving and community integration after stroke. Much research on patients who drive after experiencing a stroke has focused on driving assessment protocols; little attention has been given to the implications of assessment outcomes.DesignProspective study.SettingSix driving evaluation centers in Ontario, Canada.ParticipantsFifty-three community-dwelling patients who were referred for a driving assessment after they experienced a stroke.MethodsData on demographics, living circumstances, health status, driving habits, and driving history were gathered via a semistructured interview and various questionnaires administered on 3 occasions: study entry (≥1 month after stroke; n = 53), 3 months (n = 44), and 1 year (n = 43).Main Outcome MeasurementReintegration into the community at 1 year, as evaluated with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI).ResultsThe participants had sustained a stroke an average of 12.3 months before study entry. Two subjects were driving at study entry. At 1 year, 28 (65%) of 43 subjects had passed their driving test and had resumed/continued driving. Nondrivers had a significantly lower mean RNLI score than drivers. Subjects who were not driving at study entry but had resumed driving by 1 year had a significant increase in RNLI score (P = .011). Driving was significantly associated with community integration after adjustment for concomitant health status (P < .001). Driving and health status were associated with community integration at 1 year, accounting for 32% of the variance in RNLI score.ConclusionsDriving after stroke was significantly associated with community integration in patients after adjustment for health status (P < .001). Community decision-makers may decide to use the study results when determining the transportation needs of stroke survivors who self-limit their driving because of weather, time of day, or distance concerns.
Journal: PM&R - Volume 2, Issue 6, June 2010, Pages 497–503