کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2714932 1145294 2016 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Reliability of Ultrasound Imaging Measures of Transverse Abdominis and Lumbar Multifidus in Various Positions
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
قابلیت اطمینان اندازه گیری های تصویربرداری اولتراسوند از شکاف های عرضی و Multifidus کمری در موقعیت های مختلف
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo determine the reliability of measurement of muscle activation via ultrasound imaging measures of the transverse abdominis (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM) in tabletop, seated, standing, and walking conditions.DesignDescriptive laboratory study.SettingUniversity research laboratory.ParticipantsSixteen healthy participants (age, 20.4 ± 1.8 years; height, 167.7 ± 9.0 cm; mass, 65.1 ± 10.8 kg).InterventionsNone.Main Outcome MeasurementsThe activation ratio (AR) of TrA and LM and preferential activation ratio of TrA in tabletop, seated, standing, and walking positions were assessed by the same examiner during 2 ultrasound imaging sessions 24-72 hours apart. Statistical analysis included determination of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using analysis of variance for each muscle and position between sessions.ResultsExcellent reliability was found in TrA AR between sessions for healthy participants in the tabletop position (ICC3,k = 0.903), and acceptable to excellent reliability was found in seated (ICC3,k = 0.613), standing (ICC3,k = 0.553), and walking (ICC3,k = 0.737) positions. LM AR was fair in the tabletop position for these participants (ICC3,k = 0.264). The preferential activation ratio for healthy participants was substantially reliable in tabletop and seated positions (ICC3,k = 0.668, 0.684) and showed fair reliability for walking (ICC3,k = 0.455).ConclusionsUltrasound imaging is a reliable method of measuring muscle thickness across multiple positions in healthy persons. This measure may be used to compare abdominal muscle thickness across populations or after interventions. LM AR was only found to be reliable in the tabletop position.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: PM&R - Volume 8, Issue 4, April 2016, Pages 340–347
نویسندگان
, , , ,