کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2731997 1566734 2015 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Quality of Pain Intensity Assessment Reporting: ACTTION Systematic Review and Recommendations
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
کیفیت گزارش ارزیابی شدت درد: ACTION بررسی و پیشنهادات سیستماتیک
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی عصب شناسی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Reviewed research from January 2011 to July 2012 reporting use of a pain intensity assessment.
• Methodological details (ie, time period, type of pain intensity, specific location) were frequently not reported.
• No differences were seen in reporting details of pain intensity assessments between clinical trials and observational studies.

Pain intensity assessments are used widely in human pain research, and their transparent reporting is crucial to interpreting study results. In this systematic review, we examined reporting of human pain intensity assessments and related elements (eg, administration frequency, time period assessed, type of pain) in all empirical pain studies with adult participants in 3 major pain journals (ie, European Journal of Pain, Journal of Pain, and Pain) between January 2011 and July 2012. Of the 262 articles identified, close to one-quarter (24%) ambiguously reported the pain intensity assessment. Elements related to the pain intensity assessment were frequently not reported: 31% did not identify the time period participants were asked to rate, 43% failed to report the type of pain intensity rated, and 58% did not report the specific location or pain condition rated. No differences were observed between randomized clinical trials and experimental (eg, studies involving experimental manipulation without random group assignment and blinding) and observational studies in reporting quality. The ability to understand study results, and to compare results between studies, is compromised when pain intensity assessments are not fully reported. Recommendations are presented regarding key details for investigators to consider when conducting and reporting pain intensity assessments in human adults.PerspectiveThis systematic review demonstrates that publications of pain research often incompletely report pain intensity assessments and their details (eg, administration frequency, type of pain). Failure to fully report details of pain intensity assessments creates ambiguity in interpreting research results. Recommendations are proposed to increase transparent reporting.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Pain - Volume 16, Issue 4, April 2015, Pages 299–305
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,