Feeding Tubes and Health Costs Postinsertion in Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia

ContextThe best evidence suggests that feeding tubes are ineffective in persons with advanced dementia. Little is known about their health care costs.ObjectivesTo estimate Medicare costs attributable to inpatient care among nursing home (NH) residents with advanced dementia during the year following the placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube during an index hospitalization.MethodsMedicare claims (1999–2009) and Minimum Data Set data (1999–2009) were used to estimate Medicare costs attributable to inpatient care among NH residents with advanced dementia during the year following the placement of a PEG tube and compared with those who did not get a PEG tube. The study used a 3:1 propensity-matched cohort design.ResultsMatched residents with (n = 1924, 68.9% female, 28.8% African American, average age 83.1 years) and without (weighted n = 1924, unique n = 4337) PEG insertion showed comparable sociodemographic characteristics, similar rates of feeding tube risk factors, and similar mortality (51.9% 180 day mortality among those with a feeding tube vs. 49.8% among those without a feeding tube, P = 0.11). One year hospital costs were $2224 higher in NH residents with a feeding tube ($10,191 vs. $7967, 95% CI of difference = $1514, $2933), with those with a feeding tube likely to spend more time in an intensive care unit (1.92 vs. 1.29 days, 95% CI of difference = 0.34, 0.92 days).ConclusionIn an analysis controlling for selection bias, PEG tube insertion is associated with a small but significant increase in annual inpatient health care costs, as well as in hospital and intensive care unit days, postinsertion.