کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2757703 | 1567517 | 2014 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We report a pulmonary embolism with vena cava thrombosis after postpartum haemorrhage.
• Placement of a temporary IVC filter appears a reasonable option.
• There is conflict in the recommendations for IVC filter.
• It is a reflection of the absence of good-quality data to guide clinical practice.
We report the case of a 36-year-old woman with an inferior vena cava thrombosis and extensive pulmonary embolism six days after a severe postpartum haemorrhage. She had undergone caesarean section with bleeding managed by massive transfusion, hysterectomy, and two attempts at uterine artery embolization. Systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis in intensive care were abandoned due to recent and incomplete uterine artery embolization. A temporary inferior vena cava filter was chosen because of significant risk of massive pulmonary embolism. This was a controversial decision because guidelines from different professional groups offer conflicting recommendations. The therapeutic options for the management of massive postpartum pulmonary embolism when thrombolysis is contraindicated are discussed.
Journal: International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia - Volume 23, Issue 4, November 2014, Pages 390–393