کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
275961 1429688 2013 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Impact of sensitivity information on the prediction of project's duration using earned schedule method
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه سایر رشته های مهندسی مهندسی عمران و سازه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Impact of sensitivity information on the prediction of project's duration using earned schedule method
چکیده انگلیسی

Recently, the prediction of project duration has been investigated in earned value management (EVM) using three earned value methods, planed value (PVM), earned duration (EDM) and earned schedule (ESM). The investigation has shown that ESM method outperforms on average the other two methods and fails in case of wrong warning coming from non-critical activities which suffer from delays and/or ahead of schedule. The objective of this paper is twofold: first, we study the impact of the activities' sensitivity information on the forecasting accuracy of the ESM method. Second, we test the claim that in normal conditions the project performance indicator provided by ESM at higher work breakdown structure is reliable. More precisely, activity based sensitivity measures are used as weighing parameters of the activities to improve the schedule performance of a project by removing or decreasing the negative effect of wrong warning of the non-critical activities. The computational results of a simulation study on a big benchmark projects reveal that the sensitivity information are capable of improving the forecasting accuracy of the ESM method.


► Investigating impact of sensitivity measures on the forecast accuracy of ESM.
► Four activity sensitivity measures, CI, SI, SSI, CRI, are used.
► ESMCI is considered the best in improving the performance of ESM.
► ESMCI is capable of removing false warning coming from non-critical activities.
► In normal conditions, ESM is considered a reliable tool at project cost level.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Project Management - Volume 31, Issue 4, May 2013, Pages 579–588
نویسندگان
,