کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2833729 | 1570802 | 2016 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• We analyzed 107 mitogenomes of whitefish (Coregonus ssp.) for positive and negative selection.
• Purifying selection and genetic drift were the predominant evolutionary forces acting.
• The ND2 gene showed a highly elevated dN/dS ratio compared to the other mitochondrial genes.
• Analyses of nonsynonymous changes in ND2 supported relaxed purifying selection in regions of lower functional relevance.
• Issues concerning the observed patterns are discussed.
Several studies have recently reported evidence for positive selection acting on the mitochondrial genome (mitogenome), emphasizing its potential role in adaptive divergence and speciation. In this study we searched 107 full mitogenomes of recently diverged species and lineages of whitefish (Coregonus ssp.) for signals of positive selection. These salmonids show several distinct morphological and ecological differences that may be associated with energetics and therefore potentially positive selection at the mitogenome level. We found that purifying selection and genetic drift were the predominant evolutionary forces acting on the analyzed mitogenomes. However, the NADH dehydrogenase 2 gene (ND2) showed a highly elevated dN/dS ratio compared to the other mitochondrial genes, which was significantly higher in whitefish compared to other salmonids. We therefore further examined nonsynonymous evolution in ND2 by (i) mapping amino acid changes to a protein model structure which showed that they were located away from key functional residues of the protein, (ii) locating them in the sequences of other species of fish (Salmonidae, Anguillidae, Scombridae and Percidae) only to find pronounced overlap of nonsynonymous regions. We thus conclude that relaxed purifying selection is driving the evolution of ND2 by affecting mostly regions that have lower functional relevance.
Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution - Volume 95, February 2016, Pages 161–170