کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2834184 | 1164298 | 2011 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Despite many attempts to resolve evolutionary relationships among the major clades of Rosales, some nodes have been extremely problematic and have remained unresolved. In this study, we use two nuclear and 10 plastid loci to infer phylogenetic relationships among all nine families of Rosales. Rosales were strongly supported as monophyletic; within Rosales all family relationships are well-supported with Rosaceae sister to all other members of the order. Remaining Rosales can be divided into two subclades: (1) Ulmaceae are sister to Cannabaceae plus (Urticaceae + Moraceae); (2) Rhamnaceae are sister to Elaeagnaceae plus (Barbeyaceae + Dirachmaceae). One noteworthy result is that we recover the first strong support for a sister relationship between the enigmatic Dirachmaceae and Barbeyaceae. These two small families have distinct morphologies and potential synapomorphies remain unclear. Future studies should try to identify nonDNA synapomorphies uniting Barbeyaceae with Dirachmaceae.
Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► Phylogenetics of Rosales is reconstructed with multiple plastid and nuclear genes.
► Rosales are monophyletic with three major clades resolved.
► Within Rosales all family relationships are resolved.
► Recover the first strong support for a sister relationship between Dirachmaceae and Barbeyaceae.
Journal: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution - Volume 60, Issue 1, July 2011, Pages 21–28