Assessment of Protective Effects of Methylprednisolone and Pheniramine Maleate on Reperfusion Injury in Kidney After Distant Organ Ischemia: A Rat Model

BackgroundIschemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury of tissues is a common problem that cardiovascular surgeons are faced with. Suppression of inflammation, which plays an important role in the pathogenesis of I/R injury, may reduce this damage. The aim of this study is to investigate the protective effects of methylprednisolone (MP)—a potent anti-inflammatory agent—and pheniramine maleate (FM)—an antihistamine that also has some anti-inflammatory effects—on reperfusion injury of kidneys developing after ischemia of the left lower extremity of rats.MethodsTwenty-eight randomly selected male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 320 to 370 g were divided into four groups, each consisting of seven rats. Group 1 was the control group. Group 2 was the sham group. Rats in group 3 were subjected to I/R and given FM, and rats in group 4 were subjected to I/R and given MP. A tourniquet was applied at the level of the left groin to subjects in group 2 after induction of anesthesia. One hour of ischemia was performed, and no drug was administered. In group 3, half of a total dose of 10 mg/kg FM was administered before ischemia, and the remaining half was given intraperitoneally before reperfusion. In group 4, subjects received a single dose of 50 mg/kg MP intraperitoneally in the 30th minute of ischemia. Kidneys of all subjects were removed after 24 hours. Extracted tissues were investigated regarding histological and biochemical parameters.ResultsMalondialdehyde —the end product of lipid peroxidation as an important indicator of I/R injury—levels were significantly lower in group 3 than in group 2 (P < 0.05). Malondialdehyde levels were also lower in group 4 than in group 2, but this difference was insignificant (P > 0.05). Superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase enzyme activities were found to be significantly higher in group 3 than in group 2 (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference between group 4 and group 2 in terms of these activities. Histological examination demonstrated that both MP and FM had protective effects against I/R injury, but this effect was more potent for FM than for MP.ConclusionsFM has a protective effect against reperfusion injury in rat kidney after distant organ ischemia.