Angiographic Restenosis and Its Clinical Impact after Infrapopliteal Angioplasty

ObjectiveTo assess 3- and 12-month angiographic restenosis rates and their clinical impact after infrapopliteal angioplasty.DesignProspective multicenter study.Materials and methodsWe analyzed 68 critical ischemic limbs (tissue loss: 58 limbs) from 63 consecutive patients due to isolated infrapopliteal lesions who underwent angioplasty alone. Primary endpoint was 3-month angiographic restenosis rate; secondary endpoints were 12-month angiographic restenosis rate, and 3- and 12-month rates of mortality, major amputation and reintervention. Three- and 12-month frequency of ambulatory status and of freedom from ischemic symptoms, and time to wound healing in the ischemic wound group, were compared between restenotic and non-restenotic groups. Angiographic restenosis predictors were assessed by multivariable analysis.Results95% of cases had 3-month angiography; restenosis rate was 73%: 40% restenosis and 33% re-occlusion. Twelve-month follow-up angiography was conducted for the patients without 3-month angiographic restenosis, and restenosis rate at 12 months was 82%. Non-administration of cilostazol and statin, and chronic total occlusion were 3-month angiographic restenosis predictors. Three- and 12-month mortality was 5% and 12%, respectively. Despite no patients having undergone amputation, 15% had persistent ischemic symptoms, and 48% of limbs underwent reintervention within 12 months. During the same study period, ambulatory status and limbs with complete healing were more frequently observed in the non-restenosis group than in the restenosis group. In the tissue loss group, time to wound healing in the restenosis group was longer than in the non-restenosis group (127 days vs. 66 days, p = 0.02).ConclusionThe extremely high angiographic restenosis rate after infrapopliteal angioplasty may adversely impact clinical status improvement.