Thrombolysis for Acute Lower Limb Ischaemia—A Prospective, Randomised, Multicentre Study Comparing Two Strategies

ObjectivesTo test if initial high-dose, pulse-spray thrombolysis improves the early and late outcome of lower limb ischaemia as compared with low-dose infusion alone.DesignProspective randomised multicentre study.Material and methodsPatients with acute and sub-acute (<30 days) lower limb ischaemia were randomised following angiography. Group 1 (n=58) received pulse-spray infusion of recombinant plasminogen activator (rt-PA, 15 mg/h) for 2 h followed by low-dose infusion if needed. Group 2 (n=63) were only treated with low-dose infusion (0.5 mg/h) of rt-PA for 48 h. Underlying lesions were corrected if required.ResultsThe study was stopped prematurely. Complications were equally frequent in both groups. More than 75% lysis was accomplished in 78 versus 67% of the patients (p=0.21). Primary endpoints (re-occlusion, incomplete lysis, life-threatening complication, amputation, or death) were reached in 24 versus 32% of the patients (p=0.35). Neither vascular patency nor clinical parameters differed during the first year, but re-interventions tended to be more frequent (p=0.040 at 1 month; p=0.090 at 1 year) and of a greater magnitude (p=0.028) in group 2.ConclusionsThere was no obvious advantage with initial high-dose thrombolysis, which may be a type-2 error. A reduction of major re-interventions was recorded.