Right minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for the aortic valve replacement: Preliminary results

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is going to increase with different techniques described so far. We hereby report the results of AVR through a right minithoracotomy (RM) compared to a median sternotomy (MS).Materials and methodsOne hundred patients operated for isolated AVR by the same surgeon (chief of the department) were enrolled and allocated to:
• MS (group A, 50 patients, 26 females, mean age 69.9 ± 12.4 years).
• RM (group B, 50 patients, 27 females, mean age 71.6 ± 11.2 years).Mean logistic Euroscores were, respectively, 6.5 ± 4.0 and 8.0 ± 5.9 (p = ns).ResultsMean duration of cardiopulmonary by-pass (CPB) was 62.8 ± 18.3 min in group A and 101.4 ± 35.2 min in group B (p < 0.05); cross-clamp was 44.8 ± 13.4 min in group A and 74.6 ± 26.7 min in group B (p < 0.05). Thirty-day mortality was 2 (4%) in group A and 0 in group B (p = ns). ICU stay and hospital stay did not significantly differ amongst two groups. The incidence of bleeding was lower in group B, showing a slight reduction of blood transfusions and re-explorations (p = ns).ConclusionsOur experience shows that RM offers a good 30-day survival and a lower incidence of mediastinitis or osteomyelitis. The risk of insufficient vision or sudden complications is safely managed by enlarging the surgical incision through a transverse sternotomy.