کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2925462 1175948 2007 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Radiofrequency ablation of atypical atrial flutter after cardiac surgery or atrial fibrillation ablation: A randomized comparison of open-irrigation-tip and 8-mm-tip catheters
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Radiofrequency ablation of atypical atrial flutter after cardiac surgery or atrial fibrillation ablation: A randomized comparison of open-irrigation-tip and 8-mm-tip catheters
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundThe efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of atypical atrial flutter (AAFL) remains relatively low. This is probably related to the complex mechanism of this arrhythmia or may be due to an inability to deliver sufficient energy during ablation.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess whether an open-irrigation-tip catheter or an 8-mm-tip catheter is more effective for ablation of AAFL in patients with prior history of cardiac surgery and/or catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.MethodsSeventy patients with AAFL after cardiac surgery/atrial fibrillation ablation were randomized for ablation with either an open-irrigation-tip catheter (Group 1, n = 36) or an 8-mm-tip catheter (Group 2, n = 34). Acute success was defined as the termination of AAFL by radiofrequency delivery and noninducibility by programmed pacing at the end of procedure. Patients’ postoperative courses were followed up by means of intermittent standard electrocardiogram (ECG), transtelephonic ECG monitoring, and telephone interview. All patients underwent 48-hour Holter monitoring at their 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up after ablation.ResultsAcute success was achieved in 34 patients (94.4%) in Group 1 and 26 patients (76.5%) in Group 2 (P <.05). As compared with the patients in Group 2, more patients in Group 1 remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs at 90-day follow-up (22 vs 8, P <.05). After 10 months of follow-up, 91.7% of the patients from Group 1 were free of atrial tachyarrhythmias, whereas only 58.9% of the patients from Group 2 remained in sinus rhythm (P <.05). The fluoroscopy and radiofrequency times were significantly shorter when an open-irrigation-tip ablation catheter was used.ConclusionIn patients with a prior history of cardiac surgery or ablation for atrial fibrillation, an open-irrigation-tip catheter is superior to an 8-mm-tip catheter for radiofrequency ablation of scar-related AAFLs. Patients ablated with an open-irrigation-tip catheter seem to have higher acute success rate with less x-ray exposure and radiofrequency delivery, and have a more favorable long-term outcome with more patients maintaining sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Heart Rhythm - Volume 4, Issue 12, December 2007, Pages 1489–1496
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,