Conduction disorders after tricuspid annuloplasty with mitral valve surgery: Implications for earlier tricuspid intervention

ObjectiveTricuspid valve repair has been recently advocated in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery who have mild to moderate secondary tricuspid regurgitation. However, the incidence of heart conduction disorders after combined mitral valve and tricuspid valve interventions has not been evaluated. We sought to analyze the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations and heart conduction disorders in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with and without tricuspid valve annuloplasty.MethodsIn 2011 and 2012, among 201 consecutive patients referred to the Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou for isolated nonischemic mitral valve disease, 113 underwent an isolated mitral valve procedure (group 1) and 88 had a concomitant tricuspid valve ring annuloplasty (group 2).ResultsPatients' mean age was 59.7 ± 16.5 years in group 1 and 60.7 ± 14.9 years in group 2 (P = .5). Mean crossclamp time and bypass time were 78 ± 35 minutes and 105 ± 47 minutes in group 1 and 92 ± 36 minutes and 128 ± 50 minutes in group 2, respectively (P = .001 and .005, respectively). Operative mortality was 3% (2.7% in group 1 and 3.2% in group 2, P = .4). Incidence of high-grade heart conduction disorders lasting more than 3 days postoperatively was 14.5% in group 1 and 41.2% in group 2 (P = .001). At 3 years, freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation was 99% ± 2% in group 1 and 94.1% ± 5% in group 2 (P = .02). For the entire cohort, longer crossclamp time (P = .02) and tricuspid ring annuloplasty (hazard ratio, 3.8; P = .001) were independent predictors of heart conduction disorders.ConclusionsThe need for permanent pacemaker implantation is increased after concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty in the setting of mitral valve surgery. A clinical period of observation up to 14 days after postoperative heart conduction disorders should be observed before recommending permanent pacemaker placement.