کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2988022 | 1179811 | 2016 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of open and endovascular treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia in the Vascular Quality Initiative
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه درمان باز و اندواسواکسیک در بیماران مبتلا به ایسکمی انتقادی اندام در ابتکار کیفی عروقی
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی
In the VQI, PVI was more frequently offered to patients who were older and had more comorbidities, and LEB patients were more likely to have a history of previous interventions. Patients treated with PVI had lower perioperative mortality overall, although this benefit was not seen when treating patients with fewer comorbidities or less advanced disease. However, PVI patients had higher adjusted 3-year mortality in the overall sample and in lower-risk patients. Limitations to this study, especially the follow-up, hamper meaningful interpretation of reinterventions and further reinforce the need for large, randomized, clinical studies with better long-term follow-up.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Vascular Surgery - Volume 63, Issue 4, April 2016, Pages 958-965.e1
Journal: Journal of Vascular Surgery - Volume 63, Issue 4, April 2016, Pages 958-965.e1
نویسندگان
Jeffrey J. MD, Matthew T. MD, Mohammad H. MD, Jeffrey A. MD, William P. MD, Robert T. MD, Naomi M. MD, Alik MD, Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Quality Initiative,