Current state of experimental imaging modalities for risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BackgroundAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a major cause of death in developed countries. Patients often lack clinical symptoms, most acute AAA patients do not survive rupture, and subsequent surgical repair has a significant postoperative mortality. Diagnostics for AAAs are currently centered on aneurysm diameter, but recent studies claim this method to be insufficiently accurate. More accurate diagnostic criteria need to be indentified to minimize the amount of unnecessary interventions and to provide earlier diagnosis of rupture-prone AAAs.MethodsA literature study using the MEDLINE database followed by manual cross-referencing provided original studies concerning AAA diagnostics.ResultsThe currently validated imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging allow AAA research to develop in several directions. Some studies investigate whether clinically visible entities like thrombus, calcification, and vascular anatomy could be implemented directly into clinical practice through use of ultrasound or computed tomography. Experimental studies on intravascular ultrasound, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, ultrasound particle image velocimetry and superparamagnetic particles in magnetic resonance imaging propose new methodologies to benefit AAA research. Other studies focus on available technology toward inflammation, metabolism, and the effects of hemodynamics on vascular integrity.ConclusionsContradictory outcomes, low availability of experimental imaging modalities, and an often small population size hamper research in this field. Introducing new techniques and biomarkers in current or experimental modalities may prove to be the next step in the development of new diagnostic criteria for the risk assessment of AAA rupture. Until then, the AAA diameter remains the gold standard as a clinical risk factor.