Role of dominant versus non-dominant hand position during uninterrupted chest compression CPR by novice rescuers: A randomized double-blind crossover study

SummaryBackgroundPrevious research has suggested improved quality of chest compressions when the dominant hand was in contact with the sternum. However, the study was in health care professionals and during conventional chest compression-ventilation CPR. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis, in null form, that the quality of external chest compressions (ECC) in novice rescuers during 5 min of uninterrupted chest compression CPR (UCC-CPR) is independent of the hand in contact with the sternum. Confirmation of the hypothesis would allow the use of either hand by the novice rescuers during UCC-CPR.MethodsFifty-nine first year public heath students participated in this randomised double-blind crossover study. After completion of a standard adult BLS course, they performed single rescuer adult UCC-CPR for 5 min on a recording Resusci Anne®. One week later they changed the hand of contact with the sternum while performing ECC. The quality of ECC was recorded by the skill meter for the dominant and non-dominant hand during 5 min ECC.ResultsThe total number of correct chest compressions in the dominant hand group (DH), mean 183 ± 152, was not statistically different from the non-dominant hand group (NH), mean 152 ± 135 (P = 0.09). The number of ECC with inadequate depth in the DH group, mean 197 ± 174 and NH group, mean 196 ± 173 were comparable (P = 0.1). The incidence of ECC exceeding the recommended depth in the DH group, mean 51 ± 110 and NH group, mean 32 ± 75 were comparable (P = 0.1).ConclusionsAlthough there is a trend to increased incidence of correct chest compressions with positioning the dominant hand in contact with the sternum, it does not reach statistical significance during UCC-CPR by the novice rescuers for 5 min.