Vascular Surgery Training after Primary Certification: Where We Go from Here

Program directors in vascular surgery have an increasingly complex set of responsibilities in the management of a vascular surgery residency, now that primary certification has been approved for vascular surgery and new training paradigms have been created in addition to the previous sequential training and certification in both general and vascular surgery. With the availability of new training paradigms, such as the 3+3 curriculum or entrance into a vascular residency program of 5 or 6 years directly out of medical school, the program director will become responsible for ensuring adequate training in basic surgical principals as well in the management of vascular pathology. Areas of added responsibility will include recruiting trainees, maintaining training case volumes, developing effective educational curricula and certifying the quality of the residents. This article discusses these tasks in detail, identifying special problem areas, such as changing lifestyle expectations, particularly in recruiting women, now approaching one half of medical students; expansion to meet the increasing need for vascular surgeons in the future as the population ages; funding vascular fellowship training; maintaining open surgical case loads while providing the facilities and supervision for adequate endovascular surgical training; providing a useful experience in both noninvasive vascular diagnosis and nonoperative management of vascular disease—in short, an experience that will result in Board certification and obtaining hospital privileges and a career that satisfies their choice of vascular surgery as a specialty.