کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3052042 | 1186072 | 2014 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Bioavailability was comparable between intranasal and rectal gel diazepam.
• High (20 mg) and low (5 mg) doses of intranasal diazepam were dose proportional.
• Both formulations of diazepam were well tolerated with expected safety profiles.
• Local mild to moderate adverse effects did not affect diazepam use or exposure.
• Intranasal diazepam may be preferred for acute treatment of seizure clusters.
SummaryDiazepam rectal gel (RG) is currently the only approved rescue therapy for outpatient management of seizure clusters in the United States. There is an unmet medical need for an alternative rescue therapy for seizure clusters that is effective, and more convenient to administer with a socially acceptable method of delivery. An intranasal diazepam formulation has been developed, and this study evaluates the tolerability and bioavailability of diazepam nasal spray (NS) relative to an equivalent dose of diazepam-RG in healthy adults. Twenty-four healthy adults were enrolled in a phase 1, open-label, 3-period crossover study. Plasma diazepam and metabolite concentrations were measured by serial sampling. Dose proportionality for 5- and 20-mg intranasal doses and the bioavailability of 20 mg diazepam-NS relative to 20 mg diazepam-RG were assessed by maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure parameters (AUC0–∞ and AUC0–24). The mean Cmax values for 20 mg diazepam-NS and 20 mg diazepam-RG were 378 ± 106 and 328 ± 152 ng/mL, achieved at 1.0 and 1.5 h, respectively. Subjects administered intranasal and rectal gel formulations experienced nasal and rectal leakage, respectively. Diazepam absorption following intranasal administration was consistent but 3 subjects with diazepam-RG had low plasma drug levels at the earliest assessment of 5 min, due to poor retention, and were excluded from analysis. Excluding them, the treatment ratios (20 mg diazepam-NS:20 mg diazepam-RG) and 90% confidence intervals for diazepam Cmax and AUC0–24 were 0.98 (0.85–1.14) and 0.89 (0.80–0.98), respectively, suggesting that the bioavailability was comparable between the two formulations. Dose proportionality was observed between the lowest and highest dose-strengths of intranasal formulation. Both intranasal and rectal treatments were well tolerated with mild to moderate adverse events. Results suggest that a single-dose of 20 mg diazepam-NS is tolerable and comparable in bioavailability to that of diazepam-RG. The intranasal formulation may provide caregivers and patients with a more socially acceptable and convenient alternative rescue therapy in the acute treatment of seizure clusters.
Journal: Epilepsy Research - Volume 108, Issue 7, September 2014, Pages 1204–1211