Intracisternal versus intracarotid infusion of L-arginine in experimental cerebral vasospasm

AimThe effect of short term intracisternal and intracarotid L-arginine infusion on experimental cerebral acute phase vasospasm in a rabbit subarachnoid haemorrhage model is investigated, and the two groups compared.Materials and MethodSubarachnoid haemorrhage was produced by intracisternal injection of autologous blood in New Zealand rabbits. On the fourth day after subarachnoid haemorrhage, cerebral blood flow was monitored using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography during intracisternal and intracarotid saline and L-arginine infusions.ResultCerebral blood flow measurements revealed resolution of vasospasm with short-term intracisternal and intracarotid L-arginine infusion. No significant difference was found between the effects of intracisternal and intracarotid L-arginine infusions, however intracarotid L-arginine infusion created a more potent vasodilatation towards the end of infusion.ConclusionBoth intracisternal and intracarotid short term L-arginine infusion significantly improve acute phase cerebral vasospasm after experimental subarachnoid haemorrhage. Intracarotid L-arginine infusion is more potent and safer as large amounts of intracisternal L-arginine may lead to overproduction of nitric oxide by inducible nitric oxide synthase with the production of free radicals.