High expectation in non-evidence-based smoking cessation interventions among smokers—The Colaus study

ObjectiveTo assess the preferred methods to quit smoking among current smokers.MethodCross-sectional, population-based study conducted in Lausanne between 2003 and 2006 including 988 current smokers. Preference was assessed by questionnaire. Evidence-based (EB) methods were nicotine replacement, bupropion, physician or group consultations; non-EB-based methods were acupuncture, hypnosis and autogenic training.ResultsEB methods were frequently (physician consultation: 48%, 95% confidence interval (45–51); nicotine replacement therapy: 35% (32–38)) or rarely (bupropion and group consultations: 13% (11–15)) preferred by the participants. Non-EB methods were preferred by a third (acupuncture: 33% (30–36)), a quarter (hypnosis: 26% (23–29)) or a seventh (autogenic training: 13% (11–15)) of responders. On multivariate analysis, women preferred both EB and non-EB methods more frequently than men (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval: 1.46 (1.10–1.93) and 2.26 (1.72–2.96) for any EB and non-EB method, respectively). Preference for non-EB methods was higher among highly educated participants, while no such relationship was found for EB methods.DiscussionMany smokers are unaware of the full variety of methods to quit smoking. Better information regarding these methods is necessary.