Donor-site morbidity after fibula free flap transfer: a comparison of subjective evaluation using a visual analogue scale and point evaluation system

The aims of this study were: (1) to compare the visual analogue scale (VAS) with the point evaluation system (PES) in the subjective evaluation of donor-site morbidity after fibula free flap transfer; (2) to compare the functional outcomes of fibula free flap surgery between patients with a normal body mass index (BMI) and patients with a high BMI, and between skin paddle and non-skin paddle harvesting; and (3) to determine the correlation between functional outcomes and related factors. This study included 15 patients who underwent a vascularized fibula free flap transfer for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. Subjective self-evaluation of functional outcomes was done using a VAS followed by a PES. Comparison of the VAS and PES scores was assessed with Pearson's correlation coefficient. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The VAS score was significantly correlated with the PES score (r = 0.63, P = 0.01). The tourniquet times for the skin paddle group were longer than for the non-skin paddle group (P = 0.02), while the satisfaction score of the non-skin paddle group was higher than that of the skin paddle group (P = 0.03). The VAS is a potential option for the subjective evaluation of donor-site morbidity after fibula free flap transfer.