Comparison of two different flap designs in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of flap design on the postoperative sequelae of pain, swelling, trismus and wound dehiscence after surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars (M3). 20 patients aged 20–30 years who required removal of bilateral impacted M3 were included in the study. Maximum interincisal opening and facial measurements were recorded preoperatively. Bayonet flap was used on one side and envelope flap on the other side for the removal of impacted M3. The effect of flap design on pain, swelling, trismus and wound dehiscence was evaluated postoperatively. Pain and wound dehiscence were significantly greater in the envelope flap group compared with the bayonet flap group (P < 0.05). No significant difference in postoperative swelling and trismus was found in either group (P > 0.05). The bayonet flap was superior to the envelope flap for postoperative pain and wound dehiscence. There was no difference in postoperative swelling and trismus between the two groups.