کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3148185 | 1197390 | 2015 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We modeled 3 finite element (FE) models of G1, G2, and uG files before manufacturing uG prototype.
• We simulated the FE models to compare the bending stiffness and torsional stiffness.
• Based on the FE simulations, uG was fabricated and tested for mechanical properties.
• Fatigue resistance, torsional strength, and screw-in force were compared for the 3 files.
IntroductionThis study was done to develop a glide path preparation nickel-titanium rotary instrument by size optimization procedures and evaluate the properties of the prototype.MethodsG-1 and G-2 files were tested for cyclic fatigue, torsional resistance, and screw-in force. The cyclic fatigue resistance was compared by measuring the number of cycles to failure by using a 90° curved metal canal (n = 10). The torsional resistance was evaluated at 3 levels (2, 4, and 6 mm from the file tip) by measuring the ultimate torsional load (n = 10 each level). The screw-in forces (n = 5) were measured during sequential pecking in a simulated resin block to the end of foramen by using the customized shaping device (AEndoS). Meanwhile, finite element models of G-1 and G-2 files were made by reverse engineering, and their bending stiffness and torsional properties were calculated. By analyzing the results from mechanical tests and finite element analysis, a universal G (uG) file was designed to have intermediary mechanical properties, and then the prototype was fabricated by the manufacturer. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance tests and screw-in force with the uG were compared with G-1 and G-2 files.ResultsThe prototype of uG file showed higher cyclic fatigue resistance than the G-2 file and intermediary torsional strength and screw-in forces between the G-1 and G-2 files.ConclusionsThe prototype production from a size optimization procedure produced appropriate mechanical properties for the purpose of development.
Journal: Journal of Endodontics - Volume 41, Issue 6, June 2015, Pages 916–919