کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3223880 1588102 2015 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Prehospital recognition of severe sepsis: development and validation of a novel EMS screening tool
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
شناخت پیش بیمارستانی از سپسیس شدید: توسعه و اعتبار سنجی یک ابزار غربالگری جدید EMS
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی طب اورژانس
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo derive and validate a predictive model and novel emergency medical services (EMS) screening tool for severe sepsis (SS).DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingA single EMS system and an urban, public hospital.PatientsSequential adult, nontrauma, nonarrest, at-risk, EMS-transported patients between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012 were included in the study. At-risk patients were defined as having all 3 of the following criteria present in the EMS setting: (1) heart rate greater than 90 beats/min, (2) respiratory rate greater than 20 beats/min, and (3) systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg.InterventionsNone.Measurements and Main ResultsAmong 66,439 EMS encounters, 555 met the criteria for analysis. Fourteen percent (n = 75) of patients had SS, of which 19% (n = 14) were identified by EMS clinical judgment. In-hospital mortality for patients with SS was 31% (n = 23). Six EMS characteristics were found to be predictors of SS: older age, transport from nursing home, Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) 9-1-1 chief concern category of “sick person,” hot tactile temperature assessment, low systolic blood pressure, and low oxygen saturation. The final predictive model showed good discrimination in derivation and validation subgroups (areas under curves, 0.843 and 0.820, respectively). Sensitivity of the final model was 91% in the derivation group and 78% in the validation group. At a predefined threshold of 2 or more points, prehospital severe sepsis (PRESS) score sensitivity was 86%.ConclusionsThe PRESS score is a novel EMS screening tool for SS that demonstrates a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 47%. Additional validation is needed before this tool can be recommended for widespread clinical use.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The American Journal of Emergency Medicine - Volume 33, Issue 9, September 2015, Pages 1119–1125
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,