کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3224075 1588111 2014 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. Randomized crossover manikin study
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه سه دستگاه دسترسی مختلف درونزا برای بزرگسالان در هنگام احیا. منکین متقاطع تصادفی مطالعه یک ؟؟
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی طب اورژانس
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundThe study was designed to investigate the success rate and time of insertion intraosseous access during simulated resuscitation.Material and methodsThis was a randomized crossover study involving 107 paramedics. They were timed from start of insertion attempt to successful insertion and asked to score perceived difficulty of intraosseus access devices. Bone injection gun (BIG) (WaisMed Company, Houston, TX), EZ-IO (Vidacare, Shavano Park, TX) and Jamshidi (Carefusion, San Diego, CA) were used in this study.ResultsSuccess rates for first intraosseus iniecition attempt were higher for the BIG (91.59%) than EX-IO (82.66%) or Jamshidi (47.66%). Mean procedure time was 2.0 ± 0.7 vs 3.1 ± 0.9 minutes for EZ-IO vs 4.2 ± 1.0 minutes for Jamshidi.ConclusionsThe use of BIG is associated with excellent success rates for insertion and appears easier to use than EZ-IO or Jamshidi Intraosseus Needle. Further work to evaluate the use of the intraosseus access device in the emergency medical services is required.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The American Journal of Emergency Medicine - Volume 32, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 1490–1493
نویسندگان
, , , ,