کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3250108 | 1589166 | 2011 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Defenses to Malpractice: What Every Emergency Physician Should Know Defenses to Malpractice: What Every Emergency Physician Should Know](/preview/png/3250108.png)
BackgroundEmergency medicine is a high-risk specialty that carries a constant risk of malpractice litigation. Fear of malpractice litigation can lead to less-than-optimal patient care as well as impairments in physician quality of life. Although malpractice fear can be ubiquitous among emergency physicians, most receive little to no education on malpractice.DiscussionMedical malpractice requires that 1) The physician had a duty, 2) The physician breached the duty, 3) There was harm to the patient, and 4) The harm was caused by the physician’s breach of duty. Even if all four medical malpractice conditions are met, there are still special legal defenses that have been and can be used in court to exonerate the physician. These defenses include assumption of the risk, Good Samaritan, contributory negligence, comparative fault, sudden emergency, respectable minority, two schools of thought, and clinical innovation.ConclusionsThese legal defenses are illustrated and explained using defining precedent cases as well as hypothetical examples that are directly applicable to emergency medical practice. Knowledge of these special legal defenses can help emergency physicians minimize their risk of litigation when caring for patients.
Journal: The Journal of Emergency Medicine - Volume 41, Issue 6, December 2011, Pages 598–606