A prospective comparison of performance during back-to-back, anterograde manual spiral enteroscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy

BackgroundSpiral enteroscopy is a recently introduced technology alternative to balloon-assisted enteroscopy for examination of the small bowel.AimTo compare small bowel insertion depths and procedure duration by spiral enteroscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy performed in the same cohort of patients, in immediate succession, using the same method of insertion depth estimation.MethodsA prospective, back-to-back comparative study was performed in 15 patients. Spiral enteroscopy procedures were performed first and a tattoo was placed to mark the most distal point.ResultsDouble-balloon enteroscopy passed the tattoo placed at spiral enteroscopy in 14/15 cases (93%). Median insertion depths for double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy were 265 cm and 175 cm, respectively (P = 0.004). Median time to achieve maximal depth of insertion was significantly shorter for spiral enteroscopy compared with double-balloon enteroscopy (24 min vs. 45 min, respectively; P = 0.0005). However, in 14 patients no differences were found in median time to reach the same insertion depth (P = 0.28).ConclusionDouble-balloon enteroscopy achieved significantly greater small bowel insertion depth than spiral enteroscopy. Although overall double-balloon enteroscopy procedure duration was longer, the time taken to reach the same small bowel insertion depth by both spiral enteroscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy was similar.