کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3304064 1210327 2013 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های گوارشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundPneumatic dilation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) are the mainstays of therapy in idiopathic achalasia. Equipoise exists in choosing the first-line therapy.ObjectiveTo assess comparative efficacies and adverse event rates of these methods.DesignIntention-to-treat, fixed-model, Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing PD with LHM.SettingRandomized controlled trial comparing PD versus LHM.PatientsPatients with newly diagnosed idiopathic achalasia.InterventionComprehensive electronic and manual literature search from 1966 to March 2012 independently by two reviewers.Main Outcome MeasurementsResponse rate, rate of different adverse events, and quality of life after each therapy.ResultsThree of 161 retrieved studies between 2007 and 2011, including 346 patients, were included. At 1 year, the cumulative response rate was significantly higher with LHM (86% vs 76%, odds ratio 1.98 (confidence interval 1.14-3.45); P = .02), with no significant heterogeneity (P = .39; I2 0%). Rates of major mucosal tears requiring subsequent intervention with LHM were significantly lower than those of esophageal perforation with PD requiring postprocedural medical or surgical therapy (0.6% and 4.8%, respectively; P = .04). Postprocedural rates of gastroesophageal reflux, lower esophageal sphincter pressures, and quality of life scores did not differ in trials with sufficient data. Data on longer follow-up were not available.LimitationsLack of data on follow-ups over 1 year and a small number of included studies.ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that LHM may provide greater response rates as compared with graded PD in the treatment of newly diagnosed idiopathic achalasia, with lesser rates of major adverse events, in up to 1 year after treatment, although additional data are needed to confirm the validity of this conclusion in long-term follow-up.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Volume 78, Issue 3, September 2013, Pages 468–475
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,