Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time

BackgroundInsufficient detection of proximal serrated polyps (PSP) might explain the occurrence of a proportion of interval carcinomas in colonoscopy surveillance programs.ObjectiveTo compare PSP detection among endoscopists and to identify patient-related and endoscopist-related factors associated with PSP detection.DesignProspective study in unselected patients.SettingColonoscopy screening program for colorectal cancer at two academic medical centers.PatientsAsymptomatic consecutive screening participants (aged 50-75 years).InterventionColonoscopies were performed by 5 experienced endoscopists. All detected polyps were removed. Multiple colonoscopy quality indicators were prospectively recorded.Main Outcome MeasurementsWe compared PSP detection among endoscopists by calculating odds ratios (OR) with logistic regression analysis. Logistic regression also was used to identify patient features and colonoscopy factors associated with PSP detection.ResultsA total of 1354 patients underwent a complete screening colonoscopy: 1635 polyps were detected, of which 707 (43%) were adenomas and 685 (42%) were serrated polyps, including 215 PSPs. In 167 patients (12%) 1 or more PSPs were detected. The PSP detection rate differed significantly among endoscopists, ranging from 6% to 22% (P < .001). Longer withdrawal time (OR 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.16) was significantly associated with better PSP detection, whereas patient age, sex, and quality of bowel preparation were not.LimitationsLimited number of highly experienced endoscopists.ConclusionThe PSP detection rate differs among endoscopists. Longer withdrawal times are associated with better PSP detection, but patient features are not. (Clinical trial registration number: NTR1888.)