کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3304876 | 1210343 | 2012 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

BackgroundAfter endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for Barrett's esophagus (BE), surveillance of residual/recurrent intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia including subsquamous tissue is performed by using biopsy forceps.ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to compare the adequacy of biopsy specimens obtained from neo-squamous (post-EET patients) and native (non-BE patients) squamous mucosa.DesignA case-control study using squamous biopsy specimens obtained at 2 tertiary referral centers was conducted.InterventionsTwo experienced GI pathologists reviewed specimens from patients with neo- (post-EET patients) and native (non-BE patients) squamous mucosa in a blinded fashion after developing standardized criteria to assess tissue depth.Main Outcome MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the proportion of biopsy specimens that contained any amount of lamina propria.ResultsA total of 193 biopsy specimens (1692 tissue pieces) from 104 patients were reviewed: 163 neo- and 30 native squamous. Of all biopsy specimens, only 37% contained any amount of lamina propria, and, furthermore, fewer than 4% of specimens had sufficient lamina propria (ie, more than two thirds of the entire squamous tissue present). When examining individual squamous tissue pieces, fewer than 11% contained lamina propria. No statistically significant differences in the presence of lamina propria were detected between neo- and native squamous mucosa.ConclusionThe majority of esophageal squamous biopsy specimens obtained during endoscopy do not demonstrate lamina propria and subepithelial structures. This is true for both neo- and native squamous mucosa. Biopsy specimens of neo-squamous mucosa obtained after EET appear to be inadequate to exclude subsquamous intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia because lamina propria is not present in more than 60% of specimens. This has larger implications in the clinical management of BE patients after EET.
Journal: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Volume 75, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 11–18