کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
331571 | 544556 | 2014 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Paper results are the definitions of obedience and disobedience.
• Defining obedience and disobedience is crucial to understand authority relationship.
• Disobedience is an active and responsible action, obedience is a passive behaviour.
• Prosocial disobedience can be a tool in citizens' hands to protect democracy.
The present research is aimed at investigating through a mixed-method approach the dimensions underlying the psychosocial constructs of obedience, disobedience and the relations between them. To this end, we consider the attitudes toward (dis)obedience being socially constructed, and we chose the theory of social representations (Abric, 2003; Moscovici, 1961) as the theoretical framework of this study.The data, collected on a sample of 190 individuals, allowed us to define these social objects, reducing both their complexity and polysemy.Obedience and disobedience were both seen by research participants as context-dependent behaviours, neither positive nor negative, per se. Also, both related to the concept of authority (individuals, institutions, and society). However, while obedience was mostly considered an uncritical response to laws, social norms or physical authorities, disobedience was defined as an active, conscious line of conduct. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Journal: New Ideas in Psychology - Volume 35, December 2014, Pages 18–27