Postoperative outcomes after open splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis

BackgroundLaparoscopic splenectomy is considered the gold standard for resecting normal-to-moderately bigger spleens in benign conditions, and in addition could be tried for patients with malignant splenic disorders. However, the safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism is not well-known. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis by comparing with the open splenectomy.Data SourcesSeveral databases were searched to identify comparative studies fulfilling the predefined selection criteria from January 2000 to June 2015. The subsequent key words were utilized for browsing “laparoscopy” or “laparoscopic”, “open”, “splenectomy”, and “liver cirrhosis”. Studies evaluating laparoscopic and open splenectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis were incorporated. Two evaluators personally strained the title and abstract of each publication. Citations with contemplated compliance within our eligibility criteria underwent compressed review. Meta-analysis was carried out according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration software (review manager 5.1).ResultsSeven studies containing 509 patients were included. Compared with the open splenectomy group, patients in the laparoscopic splenectomy group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (MD=210.30; 95% CI: 11.28-409.32; P=0.04), longer operative time (MD=-31.58; 95% CI: −53.34–9.82; P=0.004), shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay (MD=3.41; 95% CI: 2.39-4.43; P<0.01), lower incidence of postoperative complications (RR=1.34; 95% CI: 0.88-2.01; P=0.17), and decreased liver damage [ALT (MD=8.52; 95% CI: 0.19–16.85; P=0.05) and total bilirubin (MD=5.12; 95% CI: 0.37-9.87; P=0.03)].ConclusionHypersplenism secondary to cirrhosis and portal hypertension should not be a contraindication for laparoscopic splenectomy.