کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3441827 1595025 2006 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Is there a nuchal translucency millimeter measurement above which there is no added benefit from first trimester serum screening?
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پزشکی و دندانپزشکی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Is there a nuchal translucency millimeter measurement above which there is no added benefit from first trimester serum screening?
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there is a nuchal translucency (NT) measurement, independent of gestational age, above which immediate diagnostic testing should be offered without waiting for first trimester serum markers.Study designThirty-six thousand one hundred twenty patients had successful measurement of simple NT at 10 3/7 to 13 6/7 weeks and had first trimester serum screening. No risks were reported until second trimester serum screening was completed.ResultsThirty-two patients (0.09%) had NT ≥4.0 mm; the lowest combined first trimester trisomy 21 risk assessment in euploid cases was 1 in 8 and among aneuploidy cases was 7 in 8. One hundred twenty-eight patients (0.3%) had simple NT ≥3.0 mm: the lowest combined first trimester trisomy 21 risk assessment of any patient in this group was 1 in 1479 and the lowest risk assessment among aneuploid cases was 1 in 2. Ten patients (8%) had first trimester trisomy 21 risk assessments lowered to less that 1:200 and none of these 10 cases had an abnormal outcome.ConclusionDuring first trimester Down syndrome screening, whenever an NT measurement of 3.0 mm or greater is obtained there is minimal benefit in waiting for serum screening results, and no benefit for NT of 4.0 mm or greater. Differentiation between cystic hygroma and enlarged simple NT (≥3.0 mm) is now a moot point as both are sufficiently high risk situations to warrant immediate CVS.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Volume 195, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages 843–847
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,