کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3448382 | 1595683 | 2015 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectiveTo identify the predictors for successful neurodynamic management in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.DesignProspective cohort, prediction rule study.SettingHospital.ParticipantsPatients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (N=51) underwent clinical examination and measurement of physical parameters, including femoral slump test, lower-extremity alignment, flexibility and muscle strength, and functional level.InterventionPatients received 6 treatment sessions of femoral nerve mobilization within 2 weeks.Main Outcome MeasuresPain level during functional testing was assessed before and after the first and sixth session of treatment. Patients were then grouped into responder and nonresponder groups. Criteria for the responder group was a pain score decrease ≥50% or Global Rating Scale score ≥4. Chi-square and independent t tests were used to identify potential variables with a significance level of .10, and stepwise logistic regression was used to find predictors with a significance level of .05.ResultsTwenty-five patients responded to the initial treatment (immediate effect), and 28 patients responded after 6 sessions (longer-term effect). A positive femoral slump test was identified as the predictor for the immediate treatment effect. The prediction factors for the longer-term effect included responding to femoral nerve mobilization the first time and a bilateral difference in hip extension angles. Application of the clinical predictors improved the success rate to 90% for 1 treatment session and 93% for 6 treatment sessions.ConclusionsClinicians could use the positive femoral slump test and a bilateral difference in hip extension angles during the femoral slump test to determine whether or not patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome might benefit from femoral nerve mobilization.
Journal: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Volume 96, Issue 5, May 2015, Pages 920–927