کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3449284 1595718 2012 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Fingertip-to-Floor Test and Straight Leg Raising Test: Validity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Value in Patients With Acute/Subacute Low Back Pain
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پزشکی و دندانپزشکی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Fingertip-to-Floor Test and Straight Leg Raising Test: Validity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Value in Patients With Acute/Subacute Low Back Pain
چکیده انگلیسی

Ekedahl H, Jönsson B, Frobell RB. Fingertip-to-floor test and straight leg raising test: validity, responsiveness, and predictive value in patients with acute/subacute low back pain.ObjectivesTo investigate the validity over time of the fingertip-to-floor test (FTF) and the straight leg raising test (SLR) using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and correlation coefficient (r), and to assess the predictive value of factors related to the change in RMDQ over 12 months using multivariate regression analysis.DesignLongitudinal study.SettingOutpatient physical therapy clinic.ParticipantsSubjects (N=65) with acute/subacute low back pain (≤13wk of symptoms). Thirty-eight (58%) had radicular pain as determined by the slump test.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresSelf-reported disability was used as a reference variable and was measured using the RMDQ at baseline and after 1 and 12 months. The FTF and SLR were measured at baseline and after 1 month. Responsiveness and imprecision were assessed by using effect size (ES) and minimal detectable change (MDC). The sample was stratified by the presence or absence of radicular pain (categorized by the slump test).ResultsThe change in FTF results was significantly correlated to the 1-month change in RMDQ, both in the entire sample (r=.63) and in the group with radicular pain (r=.66). Similar analysis for the SLR showed a weak relationship to RMDQ. FTF showed adequate responsiveness (ES range, 0.8–0.9) in contrast to SLR (ES range, 0.2–0.5). The MDC for FTF and SLR were 4.5cm and 5.7°, respectively. The change in FTF results over 1 month was independently more strongly associated with the 12-month (R2=.27–.31) change in RMDQ than any of the other variables and multivariate combinations.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the FTF has good validity in patients with acute/subacute low back pain and even better validity in those with radicular pain. The change in FTF results over the first month was a valid predictor of the change in self-reported disability over 1 year. In contrast, the validity of SLR can be questioned in the present group of patients.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Volume 93, Issue 12, December 2012, Pages 2210–2215
نویسندگان
, , ,