کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3453354 1595816 2005 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The Reliability and Validity of the Physiological Cost Index in Healthy Subjects While Walking on 2 Different Tracks
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پزشکی و دندانپزشکی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
The Reliability and Validity of the Physiological Cost Index in Healthy Subjects While Walking on 2 Different Tracks
چکیده انگلیسی

Graham RC, Smith NM, White CM. The reliability and validity of the Physiological Cost Index in healthy subjects while walking on 2 different tracks.ObjectiveTo investigate the reliability and validity of the Physiological Cost Index (PCI) scores, as a measure of energy expenditure, when healthy subjects walk on 2 different tracks (20-m and 12-m figure eight tracks).DesignIntra- and interrater reliability and construct validity.SettingPhysiotherapy division of a university in London, UK.ParticipantsForty healthy subjects (15 men, 25 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 34.5±12.6y).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresHeart rate (in beats/min) and speed (in m/min) were used to calculate the PCI (in beats/m). Rate of oxygen consumption (V̇o2, in mL·kg−1·min−1) and oxygen cost (Eo2, in mL·kg−1·m−1) were used as criterion estimates of energy cost Eo2. Pearson correlation coefficients between the PCI, components of the PCI, Eo2, and V̇o2 were used to quantify validity. Intrarater reliability was assessed in all participants and interrater reliability was assessed on a subset of 13 subjects using intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.ResultsIntrarater (r=.73, r=.79) and interrater (r=.62, r=.66) reliability were acceptable between PCI scores from 20-m and 12-m tracks, respectively. Correlations between V̇o2 and Eo2 with PCI were weak. PCI scores from the 20-m track were significantly lower than those on the 12-m track (P=.002). Subjects walked significantly faster on the 20-m track (P<.001). Results suggest a large difference in PCI scores would be necessary to indicate a “true” alteration in performance (52% for 20-m track, 43.4% for the 12-m track).ConclusionsThe PCI is reliable but not valid as a measure of the energy cost of walking in healthy subjects, on either track. The 20-m track is recommended for clinical use because it enables subjects to walk at a faster pace.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Volume 86, Issue 10, October 2005, Pages 2041–2046
نویسندگان
, , ,