When and how do prosthetic hips fail after total hip arthroplasties?—A retrospective study

Background/PurposeUnderstanding failure modes, time to revision, and vulnerable components in revision hips could help reduce the risk of revision surgeries. Our aim was to investigate the association between the index diagnosis and the failure mode in patients undergoing revision surgeries.MethodsA total of 402 patients who underwent a first revision surgery in a single hospital between 2000 and 2012 were recruited in a retrospective study. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of the index diagnosis of the primary total hip arthroplasty and short-term failure, as well as specific failure mode that occurred early, while controlling for sex, age, and the type of prosthesis.ResultsThe mean time to revision due to all failure modes was 9.48 (standard deviation = 6.08) years. Defining short-term failure as a time to revision <5 years after total hip arthroplasty, the primary failure mode was infection (32.4%), followed by loosening (25.7%) and instability (17.1%). In multivariate analysis, as compared to osteonecrosis, patients with index diagnosis as infection was significantly associated with revision due to infection (odds ratio = 9.69, p = 0.013). In addition, osteoarthritis increased the odds of loosening (odds ratio = 4.18, p = 0.012). In contrast to studies in the United States and Europe, acetabular component revisions were the most common type found in our study.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that, compared with patients with osteonecrosis, patients with infection and osteoarthritis had higher odds of revision due to infection and loosening, respectively. Further studies are needed to examine the cause–effect relationship between index diagnosis and mode of failure.