کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
353098 618768 2013 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Assessment of student preferences for small versus large group discussions and access to learning materials
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت داروسازی، سم شناسی و علوم دارویی فارماکولوژی، سم شناسی و اقلام دارویی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Assessment of student preferences for small versus large group discussions and access to learning materials
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveAssess pharmacy student's perceptions of small group (n=10) versus large group discussion during recitation (n =>80) and perceived learning benefits based on access to patient cases.MethodsRespondents selected responses on a 5-point Likert scale regarding their access to patient cases prior to recitation. Respondents ranked their preference for small versus large group discussion based on the setting in which patient cases were reviewed. Respondents were able to express their thoughts in writing for five items.ResultsOne-hundred seventeen second professional year Doctor of Pharmacy students participated. Small group discussions in separate rooms and reviewing patient cases as a group in the separate room was least preferred by respondents regardless of if they received patients cases prior to (p<0.001) or during recitation (p<0.001). Most respondents preferred a large group discussion in an auditorium and reviewing patient cases as a whole class if provided patient cases prior to recitation (p=0.0094). Respondents favored small group discussions in an auditorium and reviewing patient cases as a whole class if they received patient cases during recitation (p<0.001).ConclusionsPreference for small or large group recitation discussions was dependent on when respondents received patient cases. Faculty may coordinate the group setting in recitation based on pharmacy students' access to course material.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning - Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2013, Pages 103–109
نویسندگان
, , , ,