Physical examination instruction in US pharmacy curricula

ObjectiveCompare physical examination instruction and competency expectations between US pharmacy schools.MethodsPharmacy Practice Department Chairs or their equivalents at all US pharmacy schools were surveyed regarding physical exam instruction and evaluation within their respective curricula. Opinions were also gathered regarding physical exam competency expectations and the need to formally evaluate this skill prior to graduation and for purposes of US licensure and federal healthcare provider recognition. The survey instrument was pretested prior to dissemination.ResultsThe survey response rate was 56%. Instructional and assessment methods used in teaching and evaluating physical exam skills were similar among responding US pharmacy programs. However, there is variability in the extent of physical exam instruction and evaluation as well as opinions related to physical exam competency expectations prior to graduation and for purposes of US pharmacy licensure and federal healthcare provider credentialing. Overall, 83% of programs require students to demonstrate correct exam techniques via a competency exam; however, only 52% of schools require students to apply physical findings to therapeutic decision-making. Respondents from new schools were more likely to support formal competency evaluation of physical exam skills via objective structured clinical exam for purposes of US licensure and healthcare provider credentialing compared to established schools (p < 0.05).ConclusionDifferences in competency expectations and the extent of physical exam instruction and evaluation in US pharmacy schools illustrate the need for a minimum national standard for this pharmacy practice skill.