Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences

Taking an assertive stance toward research being reviewed or reported is a challenging task for second language writers. This aspect of interpersonal meaning is especially difficult to address through direct instruction, as attention to particular grammatical and lexical choices outside of contexts of use is not enough to help students develop the prosodies (Hood, 2004, Hood, 2006, Lemke, 1992 and Lemke, 1998) that are required to be authoritative and create a texture that coherently presents an authorial perspective. This article illustrates how a systemic functional linguistics analysis can identify and render explicit to second language writers some ways published authors create textures of expanding or contracting options as research is presented, reviewed, and evaluated. Drawing on the Engagement framework ( Martin & White, 2005), we illustrate different approaches to research article introductions in connection with their rhetorical purposes ( Swales, 1990 and Swales, 2004), highlighting the linguistic resources that are in interaction with each other as authors introduce their studies and review related studies. Specifically, we describe two patterns of expanding options and two patterns of contracting options found in educational research, and suggest pedagogical approaches to making these patterns salient to L2 writers.

► Illustrating different approaches to research article introductions in connection with their rhetorical purposes.
► Making explicit the linguistic resources for novice and novice second language writers to develop effective authorial stance and voice.
► Highlighting how different lexico-grammatical choices realize different discursive goals equally convincingly.
► Demonstrating how effective meaning-making results from the prosodic effect.