From spoken narratives to domain knowledge: Mining linguistic data for medical image understanding

• The medical images that can be described more consensually by physicians tend to be less diagnostically challenging.
• The medical images that can be described with highly related concepts by most physicians tend to be less diagnostically challenging.
• We develop a method based on anchor concepts to cluster diagnostic narratives by image.

ObjectivesExtracting useful visual clues from medical images allowing accurate diagnoses requires physicians’ domain knowledge acquired through years of systematic study and clinical training. This is especially true in the dermatology domain, a medical specialty that requires physicians to have image inspection experience. Automating or at least aiding such efforts requires understanding physicians’ reasoning processes and their use of domain knowledge. Mining physicians’ references to medical concepts in narratives during image-based diagnosis of a disease is an interesting research topic that can help reveal experts’ reasoning processes. It can also be a useful resource to assist with design of information technologies for image use and for image case-based medical education systems.Methods and materialsWe collected data for analyzing physicians’ diagnostic reasoning processes by conducting an experiment that recorded their spoken descriptions during inspection of dermatology images. In this paper we focus on the benefit of physicians’ spoken descriptions and provide a general workflow for mining medical domain knowledge based on linguistic data from these narratives. The challenge of a medical image case can influence the accuracy of the diagnosis as well as how physicians pursue the diagnostic process. Accordingly, we define two lexical metrics for physicians’ narratives—lexical consensus score and top N relatedness score—and evaluate their usefulness by assessing the diagnostic challenge levels of corresponding medical images. We also report on clustering medical images based on anchor concepts obtained from physicians’ medical term usage. These analyses are based on physicians’ spoken narratives that have been preprocessed by incorporating the Unified Medical Language System for detecting medical concepts.ResultsThe image rankings based on lexical consensus score and on top 1 relatedness score are well correlated with those based on challenge levels (Spearman correlation >0.5 and Kendall correlation >0.4). Clustering results are largely improved based on our anchor concept method (accuracy >70% and mutual information >80%).ConclusionsPhysicians’ spoken narratives are valuable for the purpose of mining the domain knowledge that physicians use in medical image inspections. We also show that the semantic metrics introduced in the paper can be successfully applied to medical image understanding and allow discussion of additional uses of these metrics.