Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools

• Graph literacy is a unique skill set.
• Clinicians must be aware of these differential proficiencies when counseling patients.
• The graphic literacy scale can identify those who find it difficult to interpret charts/graphs.
• The reading beyond subdomain may represent an abridged graph literacy assessment approach.
• Future informatics resources should be matched to corresponding literacy skills.

ObjectiveTo determine the literacy skill sets of patients in the context of graphical interpretation of interactive dashboards.MethodsWe assessed literacy characteristics of prostate cancer patients and assessed comprehension of quality of life dashboards. Health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy were assessed with validated tools. We divided patients into low vs. high numeracy and graph literacy. We report descriptive statistics on literacy, dashboard comprehension, and relationships between groups. We used correlation and multiple linear regressions to examine factors associated with dashboard comprehension.ResultsDespite high health literacy in educated patients (78% college educated), there was variation in numeracy and graph literacy. Numeracy and graph literacy scores were correlated (r = 0.37). In those with low literacy, graph literacy scores most strongly correlated with dashboard comprehension (r = 0.59–0.90). On multivariate analysis, graph literacy was independently associated with dashboard comprehension, adjusting for age, education, and numeracy level.ConclusionsEven among higher educated patients; variation in the ability to comprehend graphs exists.Practice implicationsClinicians must be aware of these differential proficiencies when counseling patients. Tools for patient-centered communication that employ visual displays need to account for literacy capabilities to ensure that patients can effectively engage these resources.