کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3815737 | 1246094 | 2006 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectiveWe have previously described a breaking bad news (BBN) training program for primary care physicians [Ungar L, Alperin M, Amiel GE, Beharier Z, Reis S. Breaking bad news: structured training for family medicine residents. Patient Educ Couns 2002;48:63–68]. In this paper, we present the assessment of an educational intervention aimed at improving this important skill.MethodsThe assessment tool was an eight station objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) utilizing standardized patients (SPs). Intervention and control groups of 17 general practitioners (GP) each were evaluated before and after an educational intervention, or a Balint group (control).ResultsIntervention group GPs significantly increased their average grade on the post-test as compared to the pre-test (58.5, S.D. 12.7 versus 68.4, S.D. 9.2), effect size 0.94. Improvement in the control group was minimal (pre-test 57, S.D. 10.4 versus 58.1, S.D. 9.5 for the post-test), effect size 0.23. Reliability of the OSCE was α = 0.81.ConclusionThe performance assessment used in this study proved to be a reliable and valid tool to assess the ability of physicians to break bad news. It provided evidence of the effectiveness of the intervention.Practice implicationsBBN training can and should be evaluated by valid and reliable measures. SPs can serve as reliable evaluators of BBN training.
Journal: Patient Education and Counseling - Volume 60, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 10–15