کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3852458 1598393 2006 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Renal Function Preservation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Early Nephropathy: A Comparative Prospective Cohort Study Between Primary Health Care Doctors and a Nephrologist
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های کلیوی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Renal Function Preservation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Early Nephropathy: A Comparative Prospective Cohort Study Between Primary Health Care Doctors and a Nephrologist
چکیده انگلیسی
Background: Early referral of patients with end-stage renal disease to a nephrologist is associated with lower morbidity and mortality after initiating dialysis therapy; earlier referral may have better results. The aim of the study is to prospectively determine the impact of earlier referral to a nephrologist on renal damage progression of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) with early nephropathy. Methods: Fifty-two patients (27 patients, early nephropathy [EN]; 25 patients, overt nephropathy [ON]) from a primary health care unit were referred to a nephrologist (study cohort); 65 patients (34 patients, EN; 31 patients, ON) from another health care unit remained treated by only family doctors (control cohort). Both cohorts were followed up for 1 year. Results: Delta (final−baseline) in serum creatinine levels was maintained better by the nephrologist in the EN (study, 0.02 mg/dL versus control, 0.13 mg/dL [2 versus 11 μmol/L]; P = 0.02) than ON group (study, 0.15 mg/dL versus control, 0.25 mg/dL [13 versus 22 μmol/L]). In concordance, glomerular filtration rate was maintained better by the nephrologist in EN (study, 3.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus control, −13.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 [0.05 versus −0.22 mL/s/1.73 m2]; P = 0.01) than ON patients (study, −9.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus control, −10.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 [−0.16 versus −0.18 mL/s/1.73 m2]). Albuminuria increased more in patients treated by family doctors in the EN (study, 30 mg/d versus control, 116 mg/d; P < 0.05) and ON groups (study, 160 mg/d versus control, 623 mg/d). The nephrologist controlled systolic blood pressure better in both the EN (study, −3 mm Hg versus control, 2 mm Hg; P < 0.05) and ON groups (study, −19 mm Hg versus control, 5 mm Hg; P < 0.05); diastolic blood pressure had a similar pattern. The nephrologist significantly increased (P < 0.05) the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and statins and discontinued nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs more than family doctors (study, 42%, 43%, 39%, and −11% versus control, 17%, 4%, −7%, and 27%, respectively). Glycemic and lipid control and stopping smoking were not attained by either the nephrologist or family doctors. Conclusion: Earlier referral of patients with DM2 to a nephrologist was associated with better renal function preservation, which was significantly more evident in the EN than ON group. The nephrologist obtained better blood pressure control, more frequently used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and statins; and discontinued nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs more than family doctors. However, metabolic control and stopping smoking were not attained by either the nephrologist or family doctors.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: American Journal of Kidney Diseases - Volume 47, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 78-87
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,