کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3869463 1598961 2010 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Stone Size is Only Independent Predictor of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success in Children: A Community Experience
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های کلیوی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Stone Size is Only Independent Predictor of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success in Children: A Community Experience
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeWe determined whether age, gender, body mass index, number of stones, stone location or total stone diameter could independently predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children.Materials and MethodsWe reviewed 149 patients 3 to 17 years old undergoing shock wave lithotripsy between 2001 and 2008. Cases were retrieved from a regional shock wave lithotripsy database. Variables analyzed included age, gender, body mass index, number of shocks delivered, stone location, number of stones and total stone diameter. Stone-free status on followup imaging at 2 weeks to 3 months was considered a successful outcome.ResultsOf 149 patients 32 had multiple stones. After shock wave lithotripsy 106 patients (71%) were stone-free, 12 (8%) required a repeat procedure and 31 (21%) had residual fragments. Number of stones per patient ranged from 1 to 18 (mean ± SD 2.14 ± 2.60). Mean ± SD number of stones was 1.87 ± 2.42 in successfully treated patients and 2.81 ± 2.92 in those with treatment failure (p = 0.065). Total stone diameter ranged from 2 to 90 mm (mean ± SD 14.03 ± 16.68). Mean total stone diameter was 11.1 ± 13.4 mm in successfully treated patients and 21.3 ± 21.4 mm in those with treatment failure (p <0.005).ConclusionsTo our knowledge we present the first multi-institutional cohort study in children demonstrating no significant relationship between successful outcome and patient age, gender, body mass index, stone location or number of stones. Only total stone diameter independently predicted shock wave lithotripsy success.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Urology - Volume 184, Issue 2, August 2010, Pages 659–664
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,